Everything about clean factory rolex
Everything about clean factory rolex
Blog Article
Recall, I am undertaking this comparison specifically from my legitimate Rolex 124060, but my preferances could be different than yours.
At the end of December 2023, we noticed the release of the 126500 Daytona from AR+F which makes use of a completely new "4131" motion. This 4131 motion seems to generally be based on a copyright SL-4801 motion (the Dandong clone of your 4130 that is distinct more than enough for Dandong to offer officially). Visible are the conquer adjustor (pink arrow) and regulator (environmentally friendly arrow) arms. This Variation from the motion has long been engraved Along with the "4131" caliber quantity (blue arrow). And it has a distinct rotor which includes two huge cutouts (purple arrow). However, it doesn't have an updated shock setting (yellow arrow) -- the gen 4131 utilizes the new paraflex shock spring rather then the older incabloc type spring. Nevertheless, there are a few mechanical updates to this motion which clearly show that it's not merely a redecorated 4130.
This really is an update into the VR3255 from Shanghai motion factory. This movement has actually been improperly labelled as being a "DD3255". As of Feb 2025, there is not any Dandong Edition with the 3255. The SH3255 v2 is based within the SH3285 (not the VR3235) in that it has a "32xx" type keyless works, so it may have problems with precisely the same weak environment lever challenge that plagued early versions of that movement.
Thanks for breaking the information and for the prolonged and detailed think about the new Youngsters over the block, Substantially appreciated. A contented New Year for you - and enjoy the twenty weeks or whatever it is that you shell out celebrating it!
Generally I'd personally advise possibly sticking that has a stock 2824 motion and no decoration plate, or If you prefer a movement that appears genuine Choose a rep having a vs3135 movement in place of a rep with an eta clone.
The two Clean and VSF are hunting very good, but the edge goes to Clean with tighter tolerances and a far more stable appear and feel.
dogwood said: @KJ2020 is it possible to double Look at my GMT movements part. I think I’ve acquired it right, but following the snafu on Reddit with my tutorial being referenced while in the C+ factory GMT controversy, I need to make certain I’ve crossed my t’s and dotted my lower-scenario j’s. Simply click to develop...
That is an incredible movement which is presently only available in VS Factory (VSF) subs and DJs. The movement has an amazing 70+ hour ability reserve and is also a true clone, so it is an element compatible with the authentic Rolex movement.
Now I will be looking above the finer facts with a loupe and going over how every little thing feels in hand and the overall feeling around the wrist.
Observe actions in many cases are labeled with one or two letters accompanied by the Rolex movement range that clean factory rolex they're a clone of. For instance, the VS3235 is really a clone from the Rolex 3235 movement. The prefix letters are crucial, but are not assigned based upon any constant principals. Sometimes the letters are utilized based on which enjoy factory completely makes use of the motion (e.g. VSF could be the exceptional user of VS3235 actions, making sure that's in which the "VS" Section of the motion identify arises from). But this sample is just not common, now Clean Factory could be the unique consumer of The brand new DD3285 motion, but that movement receives its DD prefix from "Dandong motion factory", the maker of the motion.
November 1st 2024 - Current to include an image of your new version of the SH/VR3285 motion (the "SH3285-2") which, such as Shanghai actions which had been discovered as currently being updated on July 29th 2024, this up-to-date version has the outward struggling with defeat adjustor and regulator arms and a counter-clockwise curving hairspring.
I assumed that the SA31XX actions have been the definitely poor ones, basically a modified ETA or one thing like that. Or was the A31XX actions?
I have not carried out an assessment or comparison for a very long time, In particular concerning this reference, more than a calendar year has passed so I figured It is about time all over again.
I do think I’ve obtained it correct, but after the snafu on Reddit with my guidebook currently being referenced during the C+ factory GMT controversy, I need to ensure I’ve crossed my t’s and dotted my reduced-situation j’s.